Measure Results|
| Year | Result | Explanatory Note |
|---|
| 2007 | 3.90 | We will track the costs related to displaying temporary exhibits. These costs will include, exhibit rental, advertising, and setup costs. Though there is not much control over the rental cost of temporary exhibits, we will focus on maintaining those costs that we can control, such as, advertising and setup costs. Our goal is to maintain these costs and increase visitation to the exhibits, thereby increasing overall income. We will reevaluate this number on a regular basis as our visitors increase. The results will be calculated annually because display dates overlap quarters. The cost for FY2011 was $90,927 and there were 29,812 visitors. |
| 2008 | 3.85 | We will track the costs related to displaying temporary exhibits. These costs will include, exhibit rental, advertising, and setup costs. Though there is not much control over the rental cost of temporary exhibits, we will focus on maintaining those costs that we can control, such as, advertising and setup costs. Our goal is to maintain these costs and increase visitation to the exhibits, thereby increasing overall income. We will reevaluate this number on a regular basis as our visitors increase. The results will be calculated annually because display dates overlap quarters. The cost for FY2011 was $90,927 and there were 29,812 visitors. |
| 2009 | 3.09 | We will track the costs related to displaying temporary exhibits. These costs will include, exhibit rental, advertising, and setup costs. Though there is not much control over the rental cost of temporary exhibits, we will focus on maintaining those costs that we can control, such as, advertising and setup costs. Our goal is to maintain these costs and increase visitation to the exhibits, thereby increasing overall income. We will reevaluate this number on a regular basis as our visitors increase. The results will be calculated annually because display dates overlap quarters. The cost for FY2011 was $90,927 and there were 29,812 visitors. |
| 2010 | 0.74 | We will track the costs related to displaying temporary exhibits. These costs will include, exhibit rental, advertising, and setup costs. Though there is not much control over the rental cost of temporary exhibits, we will focus on maintaining those costs that we can control, such as, advertising and setup costs. Our goal is to maintain these costs and increase visitation to the exhibits, thereby increasing overall income. We will reevaluate this number on a regular basis as our visitors increase. The results will be calculated annually because display dates overlap quarters. The cost for FY2011 was $90,927 and there were 29,812 visitors. |
| 2011 | 3.05 | We will track the costs related to displaying temporary exhibits. These costs will include, exhibit rental, advertising, and setup costs. Though there is not much control over the rental cost of temporary exhibits, we will focus on maintaining those costs that we can control, such as, advertising and setup costs. Our goal is to maintain these costs and increase visitation to the exhibits, thereby increasing overall income. We will reevaluate this number on a regular basis as our visitors increase. The results will be calculated annually because display dates overlap quarters. The cost for FY2011 was $90,927 and there were 29,812 visitors. |
| 2012 | 0.23 | The cost-per-visitor for temporary exhibits was higher in FY2011 because that fiscal year included three (3) exhibit openings, with two (2) of the exhibits being rentals from other institutions. This resulted in a higher cost for exhibits. By contrast, the museum only opened one temporary exhibit in FY2012. That exhibit was developed in-house by the museum exhibits staff. Data is extracted from excel spreadsheets and visitation reports which track costs of all exhibits and the number of visitors. The cost is then divided by the number of visitors.The cost for exhibits was $6,292 and the number of visitors was 27,358. |
| 2013 | 0.63 | There were 31,616 visitors to the Museum and the cost of the exhibits displayed was $20,000. We divided the cost by the total visitors to get $.63 per visitor. |
| 2014 | 0.40 | There were 32,269 visitors to the museum and the cost of the special exhibits displayed was $12,900. By dividing the cost by the number of visitors, the cost per visitor is $.40. |
| 2015 | 0.31 | There were 32,443 visitors to the Museum and the cost of the special exhibits displayed was $10,000. By dividing the cost by the number of visitors, the cost per visitor is $.31. |
| 2016 | 0.36 | There were 33,109 visitors to the Museum and the cost of the special exhibits displayed was $12,000. By dividing the cost by the number of visitors, the cost per visitor is $.36. |
| 2017 | 0.63 | There were 33,000 visitors to the Museum and the cost of the special exhibits displayed was $21,000. By dividing the cost by the number of visitors, the cost per visitor is $.63. |
| 2018 | 0.55 | There were 38,101 visitors to the Museum and the cost of the special exhibits displayed was $21,000. By dividing the cost by the number of visitors, the cost per visitor is $.55. |
| 2019 | | |
|